Urban & Regional Planners vs Conservation Scientists
Median pay is about $16k higher for Urban & Regional Planners. The usual entry education is master's for Urban & Regional Planners and bachelor's for Conservation Scientists.
marks the higher pay or growth. Education, difficulty and the AI rows depend on what you want, so they are not marked.
| Measure | Urban & Regional Planners | Conservation Scientists |
|---|---|---|
| Pay | ||
| Median pay | $89,320, higher | $73,010 |
| Entry pay 25th percentile | $72,020, higher | $57,700 |
| Experienced pay 75th percentile | $110,030, higher | $91,560 |
| Outlook, 2025 to 2035 | ||
| Projected growth | +3.9% Growing | +5.3% Growing fast, higher |
| Openings a year | 3,200 | 2,100 |
| Getting in | ||
| Typical education | Master's | Bachelor's |
| Difficulty modeled | 2.8 / 5 | 2.6 / 5 |
| AI | ||
| Displacement risk modeled | High | Moderate |
| AI exposure modeled, percentile | 66th pct | 40th pct |
Where the skills differ
Only Urban & Regional Planners
- Active Learning
Only Conservation Scientists
- Monitoring
Both lean on active listening, speaking, reading comprehension, critical thinking, writing.
More comparisons
Compare Urban & Regional Planners with
Compare Conservation Scientists with
Pay and outlook: BLS (OEWS 2025, Employment Projections 2025-2035). Skills: O*NET 30.3. Difficulty, displacement risk and AI exposure are modeled estimates. How these numbers are made.