Planetary Scientists vs Agricultural Technicians
Median pay is about $73k higher for Planetary Scientists. The usual entry education is doctoral for Planetary Scientists and associate's for Agricultural Technicians.
marks the higher pay or growth. Education, difficulty and the AI rows depend on what you want, so they are not marked.
| Measure | Planetary Scientists | Agricultural Technicians |
|---|---|---|
| Pay | ||
| Median pay | $122,570, higher | $49,630 |
| Entry pay 25th percentile | $86,620, higher | $40,950 |
| Experienced pay 75th percentile | $161,890, higher | $63,630 |
| Outlook, 2025 to 2035 | ||
| Projected growth | +2.1% Growing | +5.4% Growing fast, higher |
| Openings a year | 1,400 | 2,800 |
| Getting in | ||
| Typical education | Doctoral | Associate's |
| Difficulty modeled | 3 / 5 | 2.4 / 5 |
| AI | ||
| Displacement risk modeled | High | Moderate |
| AI exposure modeled, percentile | 72nd pct | 40th pct |
Where the skills differ
Only Planetary Scientists
- Science
Only Agricultural Technicians
- Active Learning
Both lean on reading comprehension, critical thinking, active listening, writing, speaking.
More comparisons
Compare Planetary Scientists with
Compare Agricultural Technicians with
Pay and outlook: BLS (OEWS 2025, Employment Projections 2025-2035). Skills: O*NET 30.3. Difficulty, displacement risk and AI exposure are modeled estimates. How these numbers are made.